Municipal Police Officers' Education and Training Commission (MPOETC) Act 120 Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the MPOETC Act 120 Exam with flashcards and multiple choice questions. Each question comes with detailed explanations to help you succeed. Ace your test with confidence!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


If there is an argument and a person grabs the steering wheel, what does this indicate?

  1. Deliberate intent, non-reportable

  2. Immediate arrest required

  3. Sufficient reason to issue a citation

  4. Accidental act

The correct answer is: Deliberate intent, non-reportable

Choosing the option indicating that the action represents deliberate intent, non-reportable, aligns with the understanding of behavioral indicators in conflict situations, especially in the context of an argument within a vehicle. When a person grabs the steering wheel during an argument, this action typically reflects a conscious decision to interfere with the driver's control of the vehicle, demonstrating aggression or an intention to change the outcome of the situation. This behavior is not an accident; it suggests that the individual is purposefully trying to influence the vehicle's direction, which could potentially endanger those inside the car or others on the road. However, contrary to immediate arrest required or sufficient reason to issue a citation, this specific action doesn’t necessarily fit those legal criteria straight away, as it may not constitute a direct violation of the law without further context regarding the severity of the situation or a clear expression of unlawful behavior. Thus, this scenario can illustrate that the action is a manifestation of conflict yet doesn't inherently demand law enforcement intervention like an arrest unless further factors elevate the situation’s risk level. Furthermore, it underscores the complexity of interpreting behaviors during heated interactions, where intent plays a critical role.